Orton Gillingham Pros And Cons

Orton Gillingham (OG) is an intensive, multisensory approach to teaching reading and writing that has been used since the 1930s. OG is based on a set of principles derived from the research of Dr. Samuel T. Orton, who believed that dyslexia was caused by a neurological disorder in which certain language-related neural connections were not properly formed or functioning correctly. The OG approach seeks to remediate this disorder by providing explicit instruction in phonemic awareness, decoding strategies, fluency development, comprehension skills and spelling rules.

This method can be very beneficial for students with dyslexia as it provides them with the necessary foundation for developing literacy skills; however there are also some drawbacks associated with its implementation including cost, time commitment and practitioner availability. Additionally, some educators have expressed concern over its rigid structure and limited scope of instruction as well as potential reinforcement of negative behaviors due to its focus on error correction rather than positive reinforcement techniques.

Orton Gillingham is a structured, multi-sensory approach to teaching reading, spelling and writing. This technique has been used successfully for decades to help students with dyslexia and other learning disabilities master language skills. While Orton Gillingham is known as an effective approach to teaching literacy, it does have its pros and cons.

On the pro side, the method’s structure encourages active student engagement which can lead to increased retention of material due to the multiple avenues of reinforcement; additionally, since this method uses visual cues such as colored cards and syllable division symbols it can be especially helpful for those who struggle with traditional phonics instruction. On the con side, Orton Gillingham requires more preparation from teachers than other approaches due its use of specialized materials; also depending on a student’s needs supplemental resources may need to be purchased in order for them to properly benefit from this type of instruction.

School Systems: Montessori School – Pro & Con

What are the Negatives of Orton-Gillingham?

Orton-Gillingham is a popular reading and writing method that has been used for many years to help students with dyslexia, as well as other learning disabilities. However, there are several negatives associated with the Orton-Gillingham approach. First of all, it can be difficult and time consuming to implement correctly; in order for students to receive the full benefits of this method, teachers must have a deep understanding of how language works and how each student learns best.

Secondly, the Orton-Gillingham approach is not suitable for every child; some children may find it boring or tedious work if they don’t understand why they need to do these exercises. Thirdly, while research suggests that Orton-Gillingham can be an effective teaching tool when applied properly by qualified professionals, there is limited evidence showing its long-term effects on academic progress. Finally, some parents worry that their children will become too dependent on using this structured form of learning since it provides them with specific instructions rather than allowing them to explore topics independently through creative problem solving activities.

Is Orton-Gillingham Good for All Students?

Orton-Gillingham (OG) is an approach to teaching reading, spelling and writing that has been used for more than 80 years to help those with dyslexia. While OG is often the go-to method for helping students with dyslexia learn how to read, many parents and educators are starting to wonder if it’s a good fit for all students. The answer depends on the individual student.

It’s important to remember that OG is just one of many methods available when it comes to helping children learn how to read and write. For some students, OG might be exactly what they need in order for them to become successful readers; however, there may also be other strategies or approaches which could work better depending upon their unique learning needs and style. When considering whether or not Orton-Gillingham would be beneficial for any given student, it’s best practice for teachers and parents alike to consider the child’s specific strengths and weaknesses as well as his/her overall educational goals before making a decision about which program will best serve him/her in the long run.

What are the Benefits of Orton-Gillingham Approach?

The Orton-Gillingham approach is an evidence-based, multisensory instructional method designed to help individuals with language-based learning disabilities such as dyslexia. It combines a variety of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic modalities in order to teach phonemic awareness and basic reading skills. This approach has been proven to be highly effective for students who struggle with traditional methods of instruction due to their unique learning needs.

The benefits of this approach include increased confidence and motivation for both teachers and learners alike, improved comprehension skills and vocabulary knowledge, enhanced accuracy in word recognition tasks including spelling, more efficient decoding strategies leading to greater fluency in reading aloud from text or books , better overall memory retention resulting from the use of multiple senses during instruction, improved executive functioning which includes planning and organizing information effectively among many other cognitive processes that are beneficial for academic success; finally the ability to apply these acquired literacy skills across all areas of study can truly be life changing!

Does Orton-Gillingham Really Work?

The answer to the question of whether Orton-Gillingham really works is a resounding yes! This method of teaching literacy has been used for decades and continues to be an effective approach for helping individuals with dyslexia and other learning disabilities learn how to read, write, spell, and comprehend written language. The Orton-Gillingham approach is based on explicit, systematic instruction that caters to each individual student’s needs.

It employs multisensory techniques such as visual aids and tactile activities in order to help students better understand the material they are learning. In addition, it focuses on breaking down words into their component sounds or phonemes so that students can better recognize them when reading. With its emphasis on repetition and practice – both through direct instruction from a teacher as well as independent reinforcement – this approach can prove invaluable in helping struggling readers develop skills necessary for academic success.

Orton Gillingham Pros And Cons

Credit: www.lexercise.com

Orton-Gillingham Does Not Work

Orton-Gillingham is an instructional approach developed to help those with dyslexia and other learning disabilities, however it is not a one-size-fits all solution. While some students have seen success with the method, there is no scientific evidence that definitively proves it works for everyone. It can also be very time consuming and expensive as teachers must be specially trained in this technique.

Ultimately, educators may need to look into multiple approaches when helping students with dyslexia or related learning challenges.

Orton-Gillingham Criticism

Orton-Gillingham instruction is a widely used approach to teaching reading and spelling to individuals with dyslexia. However, it has received criticism from some educators who argue that the method is too structured and does not allow for enough flexibility when working with diverse learners. Additionally, some claim that there is no evidence showing Orton-Gillingham has better results than other instructional approaches.

Despite this criticism, many experts still believe that Orton-Gillingham can be an effective tool for helping those struggling with dyslexia learn how to read and spell successfully.

Letrs Training Criticism

Letrs Training has been criticized for its lack of comprehensiveness and failure to provide teachers with a comprehensive understanding of the most effective classroom strategies for teaching. This criticism is due in part to Letrs’ focus on content knowledge rather than pedagogical approaches, which can lead to inadequate instruction. Furthermore, some critics argue that the training does not adequately prepare teachers for the complexities of working with diverse student populations or address issues such as implicit bias and cultural competency.

Letrs Vs Orton-Gillingham

Letrs (Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling) and Orton-Gillingham are two methods used to help individuals with dyslexia learn how to read. Letrs is a comprehensive program that focuses on the science behind reading, helping teachers become effective literacy instruction specialists. On the other hand, Orton-Gillingham is an evidence-based approach to teaching reading skills by breaking language down into smaller parts in order to make it easier for those with dyslexia to understand and retain information better.

Both approaches focus on phonemic awareness and decoding; however, Letrs goes beyond the basics of sound/symbol relationships by emphasizing explicit instruction in vocabulary development, fluency building, comprehension strategies, writing conventions and more.

Orton-Gillingham Training

Orton-Gillingham training is an intensive, sequential, one-on-one approach to teaching reading and spelling. It is used for students of all ages with dyslexia or other learning disabilities that make it difficult to learn language arts in the traditional manner. The Orton-Gillingham method utilizes a multisensory approach which incorporates visual, auditory and kinesthetic elements into its instruction.

This helps break down complex words into smaller parts so they can be better understood by the student. Additionally, this method emphasizes repetition and practice to help ensure mastery of material.


Overall, the Orton Gillingham approach has many advantages for students with dyslexia. It provides a structured and systematic way of learning that can help individuals to learn more effectively and efficiently. The multisensory approach may also be beneficial in providing an engaging environment for learning.

Despite these benefits, this method does come with some drawbacks such as its cost and potential difficulty in finding qualified tutors or teachers who are trained in the technique. Ultimately, it is important to consider all aspects of the program carefully before deciding if it is right for your student’s individual needs.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *